THE DAY THAT SCROOGE ATE CHRISTMAS.
Poor Jobless People? Bah! Humbug! The lazy shits are just not willing to pick through
junk heaps. There's stuff there they could sell on EBAY. Anyone can make a living, even
in a jobless environment like ours. Wimpy little poor people....
WHO KILLED WELFARE, AFDC? We found
this story in the L.A. Times ARCHIVE!
Clinton Demands Changes in Welfare, Medicaid
By ELIZABETH SHOGREN, Los Angeles Times STAFF WRITER
February 29, 1996 THANK GOD that FEB 29th comes only once every FOUR YEARS.
On this historic NON-DAY, PRESIDENT CLINTON MURDERED THE WELFARE SYSTEM.
WASHINGTON — The Clinton administration said Wednesday that a bipartisan
plan by the nation's governors to overhaul welfare and Medicaid is
unacceptable to the White House, warning Congress that significant
modifications are needed to avoid endangering poor children.
Delivering an unexpectedly harsh critique of the governors' proposed
legislation, Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala told a
Senate panel that President Clinton will not embrace the measure unless it
is amended to provide more protection for those who depend on the programs.
* Social ImpactHelping organizations increase effectivness and reach
* The problem with welfare A plan to restructure welfare to be helpful,
not hurtful. www.comingtogether.info
Republican congressional leaders have expressed a desire to tinker with the
governors' blueprint but have praised it in general terms and are moving
rapidly to draft legislation based on it.
Republican senators and governors charged that the administration's
suggestions would amount to retaining the current system and vowed to plow
forward, turning the governors' vision into legislation and pushing it
The administration's insistence on major changes could complicate what had
appeared to be the best vehicle for resolving a yearlong impasse between
the White House and Congress on efforts to reduce future federal spending
on benefit programs and give states more authority to administer welfare
"She [Shalala] is trying to trash a plan that has the best opportunity on a
bipartisan basis to do what the president and the Congress and the
governors want to do," said Wisconsin Gov. Tommy G. Thompson, chairman of
the National Governors' Assn. and a Republican. "To make the changes she
wants to make is to go back to the status quo and governors aren't willing
to go back."
When congressional initiatives to overhaul both of these massive programs
fell victim to battles over the budget, the governors--who had been
counting on the flexibility they would gain under the measures--worked out
a bipartisan approach. Earlier this month at a National Governors' Assn.
meeting, state chief executives voted unanimously in favor of the
compromise proposal that Congress is now considering.
Some congressional Republicans want to attach a version of the governors'
Medicaid and welfare proposals--as well as changes in other entitlement
programs and perhaps some tax cuts--to legislation that would raise the
nation's $4.9-trillion debt ceiling, which must be passed by Congress next
month. The nation's borrowing needs are now projected to exceed the debt
ceiling by about March 21 or perhaps sooner, Treasury Department officials
said this week.
If the welfare and Medicaid proposals is not attached to the debt-ceiling
measure, Republicans in the House and Senate hope to have separate bills
based on the governors' plan on the president's desk this spring.
House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) said that he did not understand how
Clinton could oppose the governors' initiative. "It's pretty hard for
Clinton to say he's to the left" of Democratic governors, he said.
* Social ImpactHelping organizations increase effectivness and reach
* The problem with welfareA plan to restructure welfare to be helpful,
not hurtful. www.comingtogether.info
The welfare portion of the package closely resembles the GOP initiative of
last year. It would transfer vast authority to states, which would design
their own programs to move people from welfare to work and receive lump-sum
block grants from the federal government to fund their new programs. The
current guarantee that all eligible recipients nationwide will receive cash
assistance would be canceled and benefits would be limited, for most
recipients, to five years in a lifetime.
There are some differences between the congressional GOP measure, which
Clinton vetoed, and the governors' proposal. The governors' plan would
provide more money for child care for the children of welfare recipients
who go to work and would permit states to exempt more recipients, up to 20%
of their caseloads, from the five-year time limit.
In her testimony, Shalala argued that the proposal would give the governors
too much leeway--allowing them to decrease state contributions to welfare
programs by as much as 25% without losing federal money--and would not
establish a sufficient federal oversight role.
"The [governors'] proposal as it stands needs more protection for
children," Shalala told members of the Senate Finance Committee, offering
the administration's first detailed response to the plan. "We're opening up
Pandora's box with this flexibility."
She said the administration would support the proposal if it were changed
to require states to:
* Contribute more of their own money to their welfare programs.
* Provide vouchers for in-kind services for families who are cut off
* Continue funding welfare programs at current levels if they want to tap
into a contingency fund for states facing increases in caseloads because of
* Guarantee equal treatment for all recipients. (i.e. all shafted equally)
Republican senators said that Shalala was trying to reinsert into the
proposals the federal micromanagement that the governors and Republican
congressional leaders are intent on removing.
"The administration wants more federal control than what the governors
want," said Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa). "The bottom line of that is
that welfare as we know it continues."
Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.), said the governors' plan would strip
support from 5 million poor children by 2005, half of them African
SINCE THAT DAY ---Clinton's welfare reform has increased child poverty. 1999
By Larry Roberts
2 June 1999
The Clinton administration has created greater instability and poverty for the largest and most vulnerable welfare recipients, the children of poor families. This was the conclusion of a conference to discuss the sweeping changes in welfare policy. Recent studies reveal that despite a drastic reduction in the welfare rolls and a drop in the official unemployment rate (99, but not 2009!) families have not been able to raise themselves out of poverty. In fact many families, particularly those with young children, face conditions that are worse now than at any time during the last 30 years.
Because the welfare changes occurred recently sociologists have not issued full reports on the impact of the legislation. However investigations producing interim reports have exposed the deplorable conditions facing welfare recipients, mainly women, who have been forced to work.
Little has been done by legislators to address the needs of children, asserted Dr. Alma Herrington Young, the main speaker. “Changes now being implemented in welfare policies ... are all driven by adult-focused goals. Yet,” continued Young, “two-thirds of recipients of cash assistance are not adults, but children.”
The report prepared by Dr. Young for the conference, Welfare Reform, Focus on Children, distinguishes the American government's welfare policies from those of other advanced capitalist countries. “Children in the United States have a far greater chance of living in poverty than children in other industrialized countries,” she states. “In part this may be because of the higher rates of single motherhood in this country. But a significant reason is because of the limited public assistance that we give to single-parent families; what we give is much less than in other industrialized countries.”
Despite its wealth America's social policy has never been generous to the poor. No other advanced country in the world has the level of concentrated poverty that you find in the US. In countries such as Germany and France, traditionally welfare has been a universal program available to all regardless of income. In America those who receive welfare are stigmatized.
Dr. Young's report shows that the most impoverished group in America is children. One in five under 18 are poor. One in four under the age of six are poor. Her report cites a study by the Children's Defense Fund which showed that children in the 1960s were 34 percent more likely to be poor than adults. By 1996 that figure had grown to 81 percent. “The rate of poverty for children in single-parent households is particularly startling,” states Young, “and the number of single-parent families is growing. We can expect that 61 percent of all children living in single-parent homes will be poor throughout most of their childhood.”
Clinton's welfare “reform” replaced the federal entitlement program of cash assistance, called Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families. TANF is a punitive bill that requires parent-recipients to work or face a cut-off of all aid. The act cuts cash assistance for housing, utilities, education or childcare, and limits aid to a lifetime total of five years. In place of the federal government running the program the act provides each state with a block grant and the flexibility to implement its own policies.
Since the passage of TANF there has been a near 40 percent reduction in the welfare rolls nationally—from 5 million families in 1994, including 9.5 million children, to 2.9 million families by the end of 1998. Clinton has boasted that since he has been in office the welfare rolls have dropped 46 percent—from 14.1 million people in January 1993 to 7.6 million in December 1998.
While many families have been driven off welfare the jobs they are taking are not enough to bring their families out of poverty. “What we know,” states Young in her report, “is that in the quarter ending June 30, 1997, states reported that only 15 percent of closed cases were due to increased earnings of recipients. While this figure may be underestimated, it is still clear that most of those losing welfare benefits are not gaining paychecks that can support a family.”
A 1998 report issued by the National Center for Children in Poverty, titled Young Children in Poverty, found that the child poverty rate remained high despite the fact that the parents of poor children were working. Arguing that work alone does not bring families with young children out of poverty the report reveals that the percentage of poor children with employed parents (63 percent) “has increased dramatically—up 16 percent between 1993 and 1996.”
According to the report the most vulnerable are: children whose families are sanctioned; the children of families who face time limits for assistance; the children of families where economic hardship results in stress and maltreatment; children no longer eligible for SSI (Supplementary Security Income for the disabled); children of legal immigrants who lose their benefits. Also included were: children whose parents are substance abusers and/or have a criminal record; children now in relative or kinship foster care; children in care where work requirements may interfere with visitation and reunification; and youth "aging out" of the foster care system.
Nutrition and healthcare
Several reports indicate that many states such as Wisconsin, Michigan and New York—which have vigorously driven recipients off the welfare rolls—often illegally deny families benefits that are available independently of welfare, such as food stamps and the government healthcare program for the poor, Medicaid.
Food stamp usage has fallen from 28 million in 1995 to 19 million in November 1998, because of the tough welfare policies adopted by states. Applicants for welfare in New York City have been told to go to soup kitchens rather than apply for food stamps.
Millions of low income people, including an estimated 4 million children, are not enrolled in the Medicaid healthcare program due directly to the cuts in welfare, even though their low-wage jobs make them eligible. According to the US Census 43.4 million Americans do not have health insurance. One-third of all poor people—31.6 percent—were uninsured in 1997. Medicaid rolls are down as more people move from welfare to work. At the same time most employers in the service sector are unwilling to provide healthcare to low wage workers. In Wisconsin, for example, of the families terminated from welfare, 100 percent received Medicaid before losing their cash aid; afterward the number dropped to 53 percent.
Spokespersons for several states have admitted they have told clients once they are off welfare they also lose their rights to food stamps and Medicaid, forcing a federal judge to issue a warning against the impropriety of the application procedures.
A major indicator of the poverty facing working parents formerly on welfare has been the growth of families requiring food assistance. Second Harvest, the largest private network of free food suppliers in America, servicing thousands of food pantries and soup kitchens, recently released the results of their survey. It found that 60 percent of the 21 million people they served in 1997 sought assistance because of a chronic food gap. The survey revealed that 40 percent of the households they served had at least one person employed.
A similar picture has emerged in other states, including Arizona and New York. The number of meals distributed throughout the charity network in Arizona has risen 50 percent since 1996. A 1997 survey found that 41 percent of the clients' families had at least one person with a job. In New York, the number of grocery handouts and soup kitchen meals rose from 13.5 million in 1987 to 21 million in 1995.
Childcare and welfare advocates at the Detroit conference spoke about their firsthand knowledge of the impact of welfare policies on families and poor children. Lois Clay, a childcare advocate who specializes in homelessness, works for an agency called Child Care Coordinating Council. Clay reported about a mother of five who was sanctioned because the state could not find the father of her second child.
“She is presently making $800 a month, $209 per week,” said Ms. Clay. “She cannot live off that. Over a year ago she was receiving assistance (and getting approximately $1,000 a month). When they questioned her about getting child support from the second child's father she gave them an address.” The caseworkers could not find the father. “They sent her a denial statement telling her she did not comply and dropped her from all benefits,” said Clay. This family currently faces homelessness and is now living without water or gas.
Her co-worker, Arthur Naulin, described similar experiences. She said there had been a 20 to 30 percent rise in homeless families during the past two years. “It is just phenomenal,” stated Naulin, explaining that one of the reasons is the high rates slumlords are charging for unsuitable housing. “Landlords are charging $400 to $500 for a two-bedroom apartment that is in a slum environment,” said Naulin. “I'm talking about terrible housing. And they are getting it because there are no choices. There is no decent housing available for these families that are being rendered homeless. It is a difficult circle that seems unnerving at times.”
Dr. Young stated that the reason welfare recipients were being driven off the rolls into poverty level jobs was the market demand for more people in low wage positions. “What is the rationale?” decried Young. “One is self-sufficiency. Self-sufficiency and the end of poverty are not one and the same. To get people off welfare and into the workplace, to do the kinds of jobs we have now, we either have to give an incentive to take these jobs or there has to be a stick. The stick is you are either going to work or you are going to starve.”
Shall we go on to describe the JOBLESS ENVIRONMENT of the Economy left trashed by the oligarchs? By the banksters? There are no jobs. Anywhere. Unless you have a bachelor's or master's degree. Many of the burgerflippers at fast food joints have one so where does that leave the uneducated? A country that doesn't educate its children really is readying them for a life of crime. We need a FIX and unless people mobilize, it is not coming. , Knowing what the FIX might look like, (shown below) is first, then effective, dramatic, noisy, crowd pleasing activism is second. (also below)
Ever since that date, til today --a woman with even five, six children must clean freeways to get food stamps. City can fire workers to use her as a slave. Where does she leave the children all day is the question? Daycare costs the sky. Querying you for information on how your friends make out in this regard, write Anita here astrology at earth link dot net* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<=== BACK TO THE FRUGAL TIPS and CHEAPO LIFESTYLE WEBPAGE
Our POSTER is ANITA SANDS HERNANDEZ, Los Angeles Writer, Futurist and Astrologer. Catch up with her websites TRUTHS GOV WILL HIDE & NEVER TELL YOU, also The FUTURE, WHAT'S COMIN' AT YA! FRUGAL LIFE STYLE TIPS, HOW TO SURVIVE the COMING GREAT DEPRESSION, and Secrets of Nature, HOLISTIC, AFFORDABLE HEALING. Also ARTISANRY FOR EXPORT, EARN EUROS....* Anita is at firstname.lastname@example.org ). Get a 15$ natal horoscope "my money/future life" reading now + copy horoscope as a Gif file graphic! No smarter, more accurate career reading out there!
<=== BACK TO TRACKING THE ECONOMY, an INDEX PAGE
<===BACK TO MONEY SECRETS ONLY THE EXPERTS KNOW
<=== BACK TO SECRETS THE GOV DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW
<===BACK TO THE SECRETS OF THE OLIGARCHS, THE EMPIRE INDEX PAGE
<=== SHOW ME THE FIX INDEX PAGE.
<== SHOW ME THE HAPPY R)EVOLUTION PAGE
<=== BACK TO "GUERILLA CAPITALISM" -- THE SOLUTION!
<==== BACK TO THE "VITAL SIGNS OF A DYING ECONOMY" the "FUTURE" WEBPAGE
<==== BACK TO THE WALL STREET MELTDOWN WEBSITE, with "WHAT TO DO TO SURVIVE" TIPS
<=== BACK TO ENRON PLANET, the DOOMSDAY SCENARIO!
<====BACK TO THE HOLISTIC GOURMET, BON MARCHE
<=== BACK TO THE FRUGAL ARTISAN IMPORT/ EXPORT TYCOON AND HIS "STUFF"
<=== BACK TO THE GLEENERS PAGE
<== BACK TO THE FUTURE INDEX PAGE
<=== BACK TO THE GENTLEMAN FARMER'S GARDEN INDEX
<=== INVESTIGATE DOING DRIP IRRIGATE- LINES in PUBLIC GARDENS as a CHARITY
<=== BACK TO "DONE WELL, ACTIVISM IS A DELIGHT and IT CREATES CAREERS for YOU as well as PLANETARY EVOLUTION"
<=== BACK TO THE MALTHUSIAN INDEX PAGE
<===BACK TO THE PHILOSOPHY INDEX PAGE
<=== BACK TO THE LUCK IN LOVE WEBSITE
<== BACK TO THE PROPAGANDA STUDIES WEBSITE, HOW GOV LIES TO YOU
<=== BACK TO ALL POINTS OF THE COMPASS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY TUTORIAL
<=== BACK TO JERRY'S REFRIGERATOR & the Tin Foil Hat Collection of CONSPIRACY THEORIES!
<====BACK TO THE FREE MONEY WEBSITE
<==== BACK TO THE HARD TIMES WEBSITE
<===== BACK TO THE POVERTY INDEX PAGE
<==== BACK TO THE "TIPS to SURVIVE THE FUTURE" INDEX PAGE
BACK TO THE "FIX YOUR FLAGGING AMBITION" SEMINAR
<== BACK TO THE SNOOKERED INDEX PAGE
<===BACK TO THE REALITY 101 SEMINAR FOR TEENS
<==== BACK TO THE SHOW BUSINESS PAGE, ARCHIVE, SEMINAR, WHATEVER YA WANNA CALL IT
<====HOW TO TINKER WITH OTHER PEOPLE's BRAINS
<====BACK TO THE NEW AGE EMPOWERING INDEX
<===BACK TO "HOW TO MERCHANDISE YOURSELF" INDEX
<===BACK TO THE ALL ABOUT TAXES INDEX PAGE
<=== MEET ANITA SANDS WHO WRITES ALL THESE ARTICLES
<=== TAKE ME TO THE HOLISTIC PET, HOW NEVER TO NEED a VET
<=== BACK TO THE TRUTHS ABOUT DENTISTRY THAT WILL SAVE YOU 100 THOUSAND!
<=== BACK TO THE SNOOKERED WEBPAGE, HOAXES WE HAVE ALL KNOWN
<===BACK TO EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT WEB STUFF SO YOU CAN MAKE YOUR OWN WEBSITE
<==== BACK TO THE "MARRY A BILLIONAIRE, SAVE THE WORLD" WEBSITE
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<====SEE WELFARE HORROR STORIES, HOW BAD IS TANF???
SOON TO BE UP AND RUNNING THE "WE HATE THE GOVERNMENT WEBSITE" This will be a domain name so suggestions are welcome. Contest prize, your natal horoscope!