Big Banks will soon be Buying up Your Public Water Systems!!
By Jo-Shing Yang, AlterNet March 28,
2009 http://www.alternet.org/story/105083/
THE BIGGEST STICK-UP ON THE PLANET. THIEVES OF WATER!
Big Banks will soon be Buying up Your Public Water Systems!!
By Jo-Shing Yang, AlterNet March 28, 2009 http://www.alternet.org/story/105083/
Water is the new oil for global financial powerhouses and water
is being commoditized and
traded in global stock exchanges.
Today in addition to being able to buy water rights and purchase lakes
on private land, an
individual or a corporation can invest in water-targeted hedge funds, index
funds and
exchange-traded funds (EFTs), water certificates, shares of water engineering
and
technology companies, shares of multinational private water utilities,
shares of multinational
banks and investment banks that own water companies, and a host of other
newfangled
water investments in this U.S.$425 billion industry which is expected to
become a U.S.$1
trillion industry within five years. And if one happens to be a tycoon,
one can also create
his or her own private water districts and water utilities.
The recent media coverage on water has centered on individual corporations
and
super-investors seeking to control water by buying up water rights and
water utilities. But
paradoxically the hidden story is a far more complicated one. The real
story of the global
water sector is a convoluted one involving "interlocking globalized capital":
Wall Street and
global investment firms, banks, and other elite private-equity firms --
often transcending
national boundaries to partner with each other, with banks and hedge funds,
with
technology corporations and insurance giants, with regional public-sector
pension funds,
and with sovereign wealth funds -- are moving rapidly into the water sector
to buy up not
only water rights and water-treatment technologies, but also to privatize
public water
utilities and infrastructure.
"Water" and "water sector" are used broadly to refer to water rights (i.e.,
the right to tap
groundwater, aquifers, and rivers), land with bodies of water on it or
under it (i.e., lakes,
ponds, and natural springs on the surface, or groundwater underneath),
water-purification
and treatment technologies (e.g., desalination, treatment chemicals and
equipment),
irrigation and well-drilling technologies, water and sanitation services
and utilities, water
infrastructure maintenance and construction (from pipes and distribution
to all scales of
treatment plants for residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal
uses), water
engineering services (e.g., those involved in the design and construction
of water-related
facilities), and retail water sector (such as those involved in the production,
operation, and
sales of bottled water, water vending machines, bottled water subscription
and delivery
services, water trucks, and water tankers).
The story is multifaceted: In the midst of a recessionary economy with
a blistering financial
and economic crisis, declining employment, and a shrinking tax base, many
financially
strapped and debt-ridden local governments are beginning to relinquish
public
infrastructure (including water) and municipal services (including water
and sewage utilities)
to privatization by Wall Street and other global investors.
At the same time, Wall Street and multinational banks are seeing water,
food, energy, and
public infrastructure as safe investment havens with stable returns and
financially liquid
assets. Simultaneously, they are waking up to the golden opportunity presented
by the
current reality of a thirstier, water-scarcer world caused by global climate
change (and its
extreme weather), rapidly depleting groundwater and aquifers, increasing
water pollution,
soaring water demand exerted by population increases, fast-rising agricultural
and
industrial uses, and crumbling water infrastructure worldwide requiring
billions of dollars
annually in maintenance and upgrade.
Often, the picture painted by mainstream media and water-rights activists
is too simple --
that of a single corporation (such as Coca-Cola in India or Bechtel in
Bolivia)
"corporatizing water;" the real story is not just of flamboyant tycoons
(such as U.S.'s
billionaire and former oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens, or more recently, Hong
Kong's
real-estate billionaire Li Kai-shing, or Britain's magnate Vincent Tchenguiz)
single-handedly grabbing water rights or individual corporations (e.g.,
Coca-Cola and
Nestlé) sucking dry springs and groundwater to the detriment of
poor subsistence farmers
or slum-dwellers, but vastly complex global networks and partnerships of
investment
banks and private-equity firms linking together with other institutions
(such as public-sector
pension funds in Australia, Canada, and Europe; and sovereign wealth funds
in the Middle
East and Asia) and multinational corporations elsewhere to buy up and control
water
worldwide.
Not only are individual corporations buying up water but a deluge of globalized
capital are
also rapidly buying up water and consolidating their foothold in the water
sector; these
capital entities are investment powerhouses such as Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan
Chase,
Merrill Lynch (before it was sold to Bank of America), Citigroup, Morgan
Stanley,
Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Macquarie Bank, Allianz SE, UBS AG, HSBC
Bank,
Alinda Capital, The Carlyle Group, Barclays Bank, Nomura Holdings, and
many
others. In fact, Wall Street and their global banking and corporate partners
are
aggressively buying up water all over the world.
Given this recent liquid-gold rush
by private (also several public pension-funds) capital, it
will be extremely difficult for environmental activists and human rights
advocates who
called water a basic human right and a public good which should be under
public control
to reverse this privatization trend. Naturally, when governments are financially
strained by
revenue shortfalls and tightening municipal-bond markets, calls for privatization
of existing
public infrastructure and utilities will be louder and harder to resist.
These banks and investment funds are aggressively entering the water sector,
and they
have raised billions of dollars for their water and infrastructure specialty
investment funds
(i.e., index funds, hedge funds) -- and they can recruit more money (in
euro, pound
sterling, dollar, RMB/yuan, yen, Australian or Canadian dollar, and whatever
currency
needed) within a short period of time from anywhere in the world, transcending
all
boundaries (whether national, ideological, political, linguistic, religious).
All this water-market reshaping is occurring in the midst of a global frenzy
over
privatization of public infrastructure -- considered to be low-risk investments
-- such as
roads, bridges, tunnels, ports, airports, gas, and water and sewage treatment.
Water is one
of the critical infrastructures, and Wall Street knows it. For Wall Street
and global capital,
water is also so much more -- it is the new petroleum of this century,
an essential
commodity to be invested, owned, controlled, and speculated upon to maximize
profit.
Unfortunately, for water users everywhere, a likely consequence of Wall
Street and
multinational corporations' ownership and control of water in the midst
of a global financial
and economic crisis is that they will attempt to recapture their massive
losses in their risky
investments in the financial and housing/real estate sectors and elsewhere
at the expense of
water users.
For example, U.K. water customers are being squeezed by their private water
utilities, to
the tune of 17.5 percent to 62.2 percent increases
in water rates, and could be paying as
much as £1,000 in annual water bill per household within five years.
Predictably, when
Merrill Lynch boasts that its ML China Water Index yields a 102.2 percent
returns,
outperforming the benchmark by 70.7 percent during a 12-month period from
2006 to
2007, other multinational banks will also rush to invest in the water sector
because they
see it as a haven with rich rewards and expect these stratospheric returns.
One possible
outcome is the squeezing of water end-users.
Private water utilities are monopolies and they are able to set prices
at will (or exert
monopolistic pricing) due to a lack of competition and governmental regulations.
Additionally, water itself is an essential good without a substitute; demand
for water is also
inelastic relative to price: regardless of its cost, one must have minimal
amount of
freshwater for maintaining daily life -- for drinking, washing and hygiene,
crop production,
and food preparation. (Goldman Sachs sees water consumption doubling every
20 years.)
If the history of U.K.'s water privatization is a guide, then water users
all over the world --
not just households, but also businesses, industries, and agriculture --
are in serious trouble
because they will be held hostage to high prices exerted by the monopolistic
private water
corporations and water utilities, many of which are owned by multinational
banks and
investment banks, and in turn these banking institutions have their shareholders,
private
investors, and even public pension funds demanding and expecting high returns
on their
water investments.
Water is more important than oil: it takes some 1,800 gallons to produce
a barrel of crude
oil, some 4,000 liters of water to produce a liter of ethanol, and 900
liters of water to
make a liter of biodiesel. Several people have already made the statement
about water
being the new oil of the 21st century; recognizing its importance, Wall
Street has rushed
into global water markets to cash in on this liquid gold. The former heads
of state, United
Nations chiefs, CIA and Pentagon analysts, CEOs, tycoons, analysts with
the world's
largest investment banks and private-equity firms, and oil companies' executives
have
agreed on this.
Multinational and Wall Street banks and investment banks often disguise
their investment in
the water sector as a part of the so-called green, sustainable, environmentally
friendly,
socially responsible, clean-technology, climate friendly or global warming-reducing
investments. They see "rich rewards" in water and infrastructure: Indeed,
the European
Union requires an investment of between U.S.$150 billion to U.S.$215 billion
in sanitation
infrastructure; more than U.S.$700 billion (incidentally, this is also
the amount just given to
bail out Wall Street) is needed to maintain and upgrade its water and sanitation
infrastructure in the next 20 years. In Australia, an estimated AUD$5 billion
is needed just
to replace aging water assets in cities over the next five years and that
AUD$30 billion is
required to build new water infrastructure in the next decade.
Emerging economies such as China and India also have such serious water
shortages and
pollution problems that they both require at least a trillion dollars of
investment to solve
their respective water problems. Water-sector investment opportunities
are also immense
in Mexico, Egypt, the Middle East, Brazil, several African countries, and
many other
water-stressed nations.
Why Water Is the "Petroleum for the 21st Century"
Only 2.5 percent of the earth's water is freshwater -- and of that 2.5
percent, 70 percent is
locked in the glaciers, ice caps, and aquifers, so less than 1 percent
of world's freshwater
(or 0.007 percent of world's water) is accessible and potable for humanity,
to be shared
by the world's 6.7 billion people, the myriads of wildlife and ecosystems,
and humans'
agriculture and industries.
Back in 2001, the CIA had already estimated that by 2015, almost half of
the world's
population will live in water-stressed countries. Worldwide, 1.1 billion
people lack
adequate water and 2.6 billion people don't have adequate sanitation. By
2025, the United
Nations forecast that 3 billion people will lack clean water. The Organization
for Economic
Corporation & Development (OECD) predicts that nearly 50 percent of
the world's
population will face severe water shortages by 2030. In China, some 360
out of 600 cities
are facing water shortages, with 100 facing severe shortages, according
to China Institute
for Geo-Environment Monitoring. The first person to serve as China's Minister
of State
Environmental Protection Agency, Qu Geping, said, "The ideal population
for China's
limited water resources is no more than 650 million people." China's population
is 1.3
million in 2008.
Water is often dubbed "the new oil" because of its similarity to oil: diminishing
supplies and
rapidly growing demand worldwide. The world has already seen many oil wars
in the 20th
century over supposed dwindling supplies of natural commodities and resources.
This
century, the world has already witnessed the genocide in Darfur, which
was initially
brought about by climate-induced droughts and desertification lasting more
than 20 years
(since the 1980s), which led to tribal competition over water and grazing
land between
Arab nomads and black African farmers; these small-scale resource conflicts
eventually
exploded into a full-blown genocide backed by a racist, genocidal ideology.
Indeed, lobbying group Justice Africa told BBC in July 2007 that "the root
cause of the
conflict is resources -- drought and desertification in North Darfur."
In June 2007, UN
Environmental Programme (UNEP) said that peace in Darfur is nearly impossible
unless
the issues of environmental destruction were addressed.
Water is the basis of agriculture -- not just in growing food, but also
in processing food.
Water is the foundation of modern cities and urban sanitation systems --
from our indoor
plumbing to centralized wastewater-treatment plants. Water is the basis
of industries and
manufacturing. Water is also used to generate electricity. Water sustains
nature and
wildlife. In essence, humanity can live without oil -- albeit more primitively
-- but humanity
cannot survive without water.
Simply put, without water, there's no agriculture and food production,
no industries, no
viable ecosystems, and no life. Major multinational banks and corporations
around the
world are waking up to the reality of water's emerging scarcity, which
can disrupt national
economies and lead to social and political chaos. In the midst of global
climate change
which brings extreme droughts and in the midst of a chaotic global financial
and economic
environment, water is a commodity likened to gold: it is liquid gold that
sustains life. Hence,
in the recent few years we have witnessed a mad rush by Wall Street and
multinational
banks and super-investors elsewhere to buy up and control this commodity.
In the past few years, multinational and Wall Street investment firms and
banks have
launched water-targeted investment funds. Several well-known specialized
water funds
include Pictet Water Fund, SAM Sustainable Water Fund, Sarasin Sustainable
Water
Fund, Swisscanto Equity Fund Water, and Tareno Waterfund. Several structured
water
products offered by major investment banks include ABN Amro Water Stocks
Index
Certificate, BKB Water Basket, ZKB Sustainable Basket Water, Wagelin Water
Shares
Certificate, UBS Water Strategy Certificate, and Certificate on Vontobel
Water Index.
There are also several water indexes and index funds, as follows:
One often-heard reason for the investment banks' rush to control of water
is that, "Utilities
are viewed as relatively safe assets in an economic downturn so [they]
are more isolated
than most from the global credit crunch, initially sparked by concerns
over U.S. subprime
mortgages," according to a 2007 Reuters article. A London-based analyst
at HSBC
Securities told Bloomberg News that water is a good investment because,
"You're buying
something that's inflation proof and there's no threat to earnings really.
It's very stable and
you can sell it any time you want.''
The Coming Tidal Wave of Privatization of Public Infrastructure and Municipal
Services
Privatization of public infrastructure -- including water utilities --
has been gaining more
mainstream media scrutiny recently. For example, the New York Times recently
reported
on cities debating the issue of privatization of public infrastructure:
Wall Street investment
banks and investors -- such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse,
Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts, and the Carlyle Group -- are amassing an estimated U.S.$250
billion
"war chest -- much of it raised in the last two year -- to finance a tidal
wave of
infrastructure projects in the United States and overseas," the New York
Times reported.
As the New York Times pointed out correctly, U.S. federal, state, and local
governments
are financially strained with "mounting deficits that have curbed their
ability to improve
crumbling roads, bridges and even airports with taxpayer money," hence
both the voting
public and the governments are increasingly open to the idea of privatizing
public
infrastructure; the crumbling infrastructure is estimated to require at
least U.S.$1.6 trillion
investment in the next five years to maintain and upgrade according to
the American
Society of Civil Engineers.
Currently, approximately 8 percent of water utilities worldwide are in
private hands; this
figure is expected to double by 2015, according to several investment-banking
analysts.
As for water corporations (e.g., those in technology and engineering, materials
and
equipment, vending and private distribution via water trucks), all are
in private hands.
According to data compiled by Bloomberg, the rate of infrastructure privatization
for all
types of infrastructure almost doubled to U.S.$340 billion between 2005
and 2007.
The New York Times also reported that many cities suffering severe financial
strains after
having been shut out of the municipal bond markets are cutting back infrastructure
upgrade
and maintenance projects. Cities are also facing revenue shortfalls attributable
to
unprecedented housing foreclosures (shrinking property-tax base), decreased
employment
base, dwindling sales taxes, and reduced funding from state and federal
governments. For
example, Athens-Clarke County in Georgia delayed a U.S.$221 million bond
issue for
upgrading its three sewage-treatment plants after Lehman Brothers filed
for bankruptcy.
Given the current state of economy in the United States and elsewhere in
the world, we
can expect more municipal infrastructure and services privatization. Goldman
Sachs,
Citigroup, the Carlyle Group, AIG Highstar Capital, Credit Suisse (also
partnering with
GE), UBS AG, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and other multinational banks
are
amassing "war chests" of several billions of dollars in anticipation of
this "tidal wave" of
infrastructure (including water) privatization around the world.
Jo-Shing Yang is the author of Ecological Planning, Design, & Engineering, Solving
Global Water Crises: New Paradigms in Wastewater and Water Treatment, Small
and On-Site Systems for Water Self-Sufficiency and Sustainability and can be
reached at jsyang@alum.mit.edu.<====BACK TO THE LIKELY HORRORS OF THE FUTURE ARCHIVE/ WEBSITE