-- Oregon Man Sentenced to 30 Days in Jail -- for Collecting Rainwater
on His Own Property
By Kendra Alleyne
July 26, 2012
A rural Oregon man was sentenced to 30 days in jail and
over $1,500 in fines because he had three reservoirs on his property to
collect and use rainwater.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oregon-man-sentenced-30-days-jail-collecting-rainwater-his-property
Gary Harrington of Eagle Point, Ore., says he plans to appeal his conviction in Jackson County (Ore.) Circuit Court on nine misdemeanor charges under a 1925 law for having what state water managers called 'three illegal reservoirs' on his property and for filling the reservoirs with rainwater and snow runoff.[
'The government is bullying,' Harrington told CNSNews.com in an interview
Thursday. 'They've just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over
and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies. So, we as Americans,
we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens
and hang tough. This is a good country, we'll prevail,' he said.
The court has given Harrington two weeks to report to the Jackson County
Jail to begin serving his sentence.
Harrington said the case first began in 2002, when state water managers
told him there were complaints about the three 'reservoirs' ponds on
his
more than 170 acres of land.
According to Oregon water laws, all water is publicly owned. Therefore,
anyone who wants to store any type of water on their property must
first
obtain a permit from state water managers.
Harrington said he applied for three permits to legally house reservoirs
for storm and snow water runoff on his property. One of the 'reservoirs'
had been on his property for 37 years, he said.
Though the state Water Resources Department initially approved his
permits in 2003, the state and a state court -- ultimately reversed
the
decision.
'They issued me my permits. I had my permits in hand and they retracted
them just arbitrarily, basically. They took them back and said 'No,
you
can't have them,' so I've been fighting it ever since,' Harrington
told
CNSNews.com.
The case, he said, is centered on a 1925 law which states that the city
of Medford holds exclusive rights to 'all core sources of water' in
the
Big Butte Creek watershed and its tributaries.
'Way back in 1925 the city of Medford got a unique withdrawal that
withdrew all -- supposedly all -- the water out of a single basin and
supposedly for the benefit of the city of Medford,' Harrington told
CNSNews.com.
Harrington told CNSNews.com, however, that the 1925 law doesn't mention
anything about colleting rainwater or snow melt -- and he believes
that
he has been falsely accused.
'The withdrawal said the stream and its tributaries. It didn't mention
anything about rainwater and it didn't mention anything about snow
melt
and it didn't mention anything about diffused water, but yet now,
they're trying to expand that to include that rain water and they're
using me as the goat to do it,' Harrington
But Tom Paul, administrator of the Oregon Water Resources Department,
claims that Harrington has been violating the state's water use law
by
diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River.
'The law that he is actually violating is not the 1925 provision, but
it's Oregon law that says all of the water in the state of Oregon is
public water and if you want to use that water, either to divert it
or
to store it, you have to acquire a water right from the state of Oregon
before doing that activity,' Paul told CNSNews.com.
Yet Paul admitted the 1925 law does apply because, he said, Harrington
constructed dams to block a tributary to the Big Butte, which Medford
uses for its water supply.
'There are dams across channels, water channels where the water would
normally flow if it were not for the dam and so those dams are stopping
the water from flowing in the channel and storing it- holding it so
it
cannot flow downstream,' Paul told CNSNews.com.
Harrington, however, argued in court that that he is not diverting water
from Big Butte Creek, but the dams capturing the rainwater and snow
runoff or 'diffused water' are on his own property and that therefore
the runoff does not fall under the jurisdiction of the state water
managers, nor does it not violate the 1925 act.
In 2007, a Jackson County Circuit Court judge denied Harrington's
permits and found that he had illegally 'withdrawn the water at issue
from appropriation other than for the City of Medford.'
According to Paul, Harrington entered a guilty plea at the time,
received three years probation and was ordered to open up the water
gates.
'A very short period of time following the expiration of his probation,
he once again closed the gates and re-filled the reservoirs,' Paul
told
CNSNews.com. 'So, this has been going on for some time and I think
frankly the court felt that Mr. Harrington was not getting the message
and decided that they'd already given him probation once and required
him to open the gates and he refilled his reservoirs and it was business
as usual for him, so I think the court wanted -- it felt it needed
-- to
give a stiffer penalty to get Mr. Harrington's attention.'
In two weeks, if unsuccessful in his appeals, Harrington told
CNSNews.com that he will report to the Jackson County Jail to serve
his
sentence.
'I follow the rules. If I'm mandated to report, I'm going to report.
Of
course, I'm going to do what it takes in the meantime to prevent that,
but if I'm not successful, I'll be there,' Harrington said.
But Harrington also said that he will never stop fighting the government
on this issue.
'When something is wrong, you just, as an American citizen, you have
to
put your foot down and say, 'This is wrong; you just can't take away
anymore of my rights and from here on in, I'm going to fight it.'
<===BACK TO TRUTHS GOVE DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW an INDEX
<===BACK TO THE FUTURE, AN ARCHIVE
<===BACK TO THE FARMER'S FRUGAL LIFESTYLE, A WEBPAGE and ARCHIVE
<=== BACK TO HOW THE GOVERNMENT SETS "CASH TRAPS" FOR THE POOR THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM