Leaked letter reveals concern of neurologists over 25 deaths in America
I can't MOVE, I can't BREATHE! I'm suffocating!!
Is the swine flu jab safe? A warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease where you stop being able to breathe....has been sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter. The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.
It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal.The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29, is the first sign
that there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself
could cause serious complications. It refers to the use of a similar
swine flu vaccine in the United States in 1976 when:
More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu. 500
cases of
GBS were detected. The vaccine may have increased the risk of
contracting GBS by eight times. The vaccine was withdrawn after just
ten
weeks when the link with GBS became clear. The US Government was forced
to pay out millions of dollars to those affected.
Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not been
sufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, are
unknown. It is being developed by pharmaceutical companies and will
be
given to about 13million people during the first wave of immunisation,
expected to start in October. Top priority will be given to everyone
aged six months to 65 with an underlying health problem, pregnant women
and health professionals. The British Neurological Surveillance Unit
(BNSU), part of the British Association of Neurologists, has been asked
to monitor closely any cases of GBS as the vaccine is rolled out. One
senior neurologist said last night: ‘I would not have the swine flu
jab
because of the GBS risk.’ There are concerns that there could be a
repeat of what became known as the ‘1976 debacle’ in the US, where
a
swine flu vaccine killed 25 people – more than the virus itself. A
mass
vaccination was given the go-ahead by President Gerald Ford because
scientists believed that the swine flu strain was similar to the one
responsible for the 1918-19 pandemic, which killed half a million
Americans and 20million people worldwide.
The
swine flu vaccine being offered to children has not been tested on
infants Within days, symptoms of GBS were reported among those who
had
been immunised and 25 people died from respiratory failure after severe
paralysis. One in 80,000 people came down with the condition. In
contrast, just one person died of swine flu. More than 40million
Americans had received the vaccine by the time the programme was stopped
after ten weeks. The US Government paid out millions of dollars in
compensation to those affected. The swine flu virus in the new vaccine
is a slightly different strain from the 1976 virus, but the possibility
of an increased incidence of GBS remains a concern. Shadow health
spokesman Mike Penning said last night: ‘The last thing we want is
secret letters handed around experts within the NHS. We need a vaccine
but we also need to know about potential risks. ‘Our job is to make
sure
that the public knows what’s going on. Why is the Government not being
open about this? It’s also very worrying if GPs, who will be
administering the vaccine, aren’t being warned.’ Two letters were posted
together to neurologists advising them of the concerns. The first,
dated
July 29, was written by Professor Elizabeth Miller, head of the HPA’s
Immunisation Department. It says: ‘The vaccines used to combat an
expected swine influenza pandemic in 1976 were shown to be associated
with GBS and were withdrawn from use. ‘GBS has been identified as a
condition needing enhanced surveillance when the swine flu vaccines
are
rolled out. ‘Reporting every case of GBS irrespective of vaccination
or
disease history is essential for conducting robust epidemiological
analyses capable of identifying whether there is an increased risk
of
GBS in defined time periods after vaccination, or after influenza
itself, compared with the background risk.’ The second letter, dated
July 27, is from the Association of British Neurologists and is written
by Dr Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, chair of its surveillance unit, and
Professor Patrick Chinnery, chair of its clinical research committee.
Halted: The 1976 US swine flu campaign It says: ‘Traditionally, the
BNSU
has monitored rare diseases for long periods of time. However, the
swine
influenza (H1N1) pandemic has overtaken us and we need every member’s
involvement with a new BNSU survey of Guillain-Barre Syndrome that
will
start on August 1 and run for approximately nine months. ‘Following
the
1976 programme of vaccination against swine influenza in the US, a
retrospective study found a possible eight-fold increase in the
incidence of GBS. ‘Active prospective ascertainment of every case of
GBS
in the UK is required. Please tell BNSU about every case. ‘You will
have
seen Press coverage describing the Government’s concern about releasing
a vaccine of unknown safety.’ If there are signs of a rise in GBS after
the vaccination programme begins, the Government could decide to halt
it. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, leaving them unable to
transmit signals to muscles effectively. It can cause partial paralysis
and mostly affects the hands and feet. In serious cases, patients need
to be kept on a ventilator, but it can be fatal.
Death
is caused by paralysis of the respiratory system,
causing the victim to suffocate. It is not known exactly what
causes GBS and research on the subject has been inconclusive. However,
it is thought that one in a million people who have a seasonal flu
vaccination could be at risk and it has also been linked to people
recovering from a bout of flu of any sort. The HPA said it was part
of
the Government’s pandemic plan to monitor GBS cases in the event of
a
mass vaccination campaign, regardless of the strain of flu involved.
But
vaccine experts warned that the letters proved the programme was a
‘guinea-pig trial’. Dr Tom Jefferson, co-ordinator of the vaccines
section of the influential Cochrane Collaboration, an independent group
that reviews research, said: ‘New vaccines never behave in the way
you
expect them to. It may be that there is a link to GBS, which is
certainly not something I would wish on anybody. ‘But it could end
up
being anything because one of the additives in one of the vaccines
is a
substance called squalene, and none of the studies we’ve extracted
have
any research on it at all.’ He said squalene, a naturally occurring
enzyme, could potentially cause so-far-undiscovered side effects. Jackie
Fletcher, founder of vaccine support group Jabs, said: ‘The Government
would not be anticipating this if they didn’t think there was a
connection. What we’ve got is a massive guinea-pig trial.’ Professor
Chinnery said: ‘During the last swine flu pandemic, it was observed
that
there was an increased frequency of cases of GBS. No one knows whether
it was the virus or the vaccine that caused this. ‘The purpose of the
survey is for us to assess rapidly whether there is an increase in
the
frequency of GBS when the vaccine is released in the UK. It also
increases consultants’ awareness of the condition.
Panic over? The number of swine flu cases has fallen sharply in the
past
few weeks ‘This is a belt-and-braces approach to safety and is not
something people should be substantially worried about as it’s a rare
condition.’ If neurologists do identify a case of GBS, it will be logged
on a central database. Details about patients, including blood samples,
will be collected and monitored by the HPA. It is hoped this will help
scientists establish why some people develop the condition and whether
it is directly related to the vaccine. But some question why there
needs
to be a vaccine, given the risks. Dr Richard Halvorsen, author of The
Truth About Vaccines, said: ‘For people with serious underlying health
problems, the risk of dying from swine flu is probably greater than
the
risk of side effects from the vaccine. ‘But it would be tragic if we
repeated the US example and ended up with more casualties from the
jabs.
‘I applaud the Government for recognising the risk but in most cases
this is a mild virus which needs a few days in bed. I’d question why
we
need a vaccine at all.’ Professor Miller at the HPA said: ‘This
monitoring system activates pandemic plans that have been in place
for a
number of years. We’ll be able to get information on whether a patient
has had a prior influenza illness and will look at whether influenza
itself is linked to GBS. ‘We are not expecting a link to the vaccine
but
a link to disease, which would make having the vaccine even more
important.’ The UK’s medicines watchdog, the Medicines and Healthcare
Products Regulatory Agency, is already monitoring reported side effects
from Tamiflu and Relenza and it is set to extend that surveillance
to
the vaccine. A Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘The European
Medicines Agency has strict processes in place for licensing pandemic
vaccines. ‘In preparing for a pandemic, appropriate trials to assess
safety and the immune responses have been carried out on vaccines very
similar to the swine flu vaccine. The vaccines have been shown to have
a
good safety profile. ‘It is extremely irresponsible to suggest that
the
UK would use a vaccine without careful consideration of safety issues.
The UK has one of the most successful immunization programs in the
world.’ I COULDN''T EAT OR SPEAK... IT WAS HORRENDOUS
Victim: Hilary Wilkinson spent three months in hospital after
she was
diagnosed with Guillain-Barre Syndrome after a flu shot. When Hilary
Wilkinson
woke up with muscle weakness in her left arm and difficulty breathing,
doctors
initially put it down to a stroke. But within hours, she was on a
ventilator in intensive care after being diagnosed with Guillain-Barre
Syndrome. She spent three months in hospital and had to learn how to
talk and walk again. But at times, when she was being fed through a
drip
and needed a tracheotomy just to breathe, she doubted whether she would
survive. The mother of two, 57, from Maryport, Cumbria, had been in
good
health until she developed a chest infection in March 2006. She
gradually became so weak she could not walk downstairs.
Doctors did not diagnose Guillain-Barre until her condition worsened
in
hospital and tests showed her reflexes slowing down. It is impossible
for doctors to know how she contracted the disorder, although it is
thought to be linked to some infections.
Mrs Wilkinson said: ‘It was very scary. I couldn’t eat and I couldn’t
speak. My arms and feet had no strength and breathing was hard. I was
treated with immunoglobulin, which are proteins found in blood, to
stop
damage to my nerves. After ten days, I still couldn’t speak and had
to
mime to nurses or my family. ‘It was absolutely horrendous and I had
no
idea whether I would get through it. You reach very dark moments at
such
times and wonder how long it can last. But I’m a very determined person
and I had lots of support.’ After three weeks, she was transferred
to a
neurological ward, where she had an MRI scan and nerve tests to assess
the extent of the damage. Still unable to speak and in a wheelchair,
Mrs
Wilkinson eventually began gruelling physiotherapy to improve her muscle
strength and movement but it was exhausting and painful. Three years
later, she is almost fully recovered. She can now walk for several
miles
at a time, has been abroad and carries out voluntary work for a GBS
Support Group helpline. She said: ‘It makes me feel wary that the
Government is rolling out this vaccine without any clear idea of
the GBS
risk, if any. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone and it certainly changed
my
life. ‘I’m frightened to have the swine flu vaccine if this might
happen
again – it’s a frightening illness and I think more research needs
to be
done on the effect of the vaccine.’
Hotline staff given access to confidential records
Confidential NHS staff records and disciplinary complaints could be
accessed by hundreds of workers manning the Government’s special swine
flu hotline. They were able to browse through a database of emails
containing doctors’ and nurses’ National Insurance numbers, home
addresses, dates of birth, mobile phone numbers and scanned passport
pages – all details that could be used fraudulently. And private and
confidential complaints sent by hospitals about temporary medical staff
– some of whom were named – were also made available to the call-centre
workers, who were given a special password to log in to an internal
NHS
website. It could be a breach of the Data Protection Act. The hotline
staff work for NHS Professionals, which was set up using taxpayers’
money to employ temporary medical and administrative staff for the
health service. The not-for-profit company runs two of the Government’s
swine flu call centres – with 300 staff in Farnborough, Hampshire,
and
900 in Watford, Hertfordshire. Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley
described the revelations as ‘disturbing’. Anne Mitchell, a spokeswoman
for Unison, said: ‘There’s no excuse for such a fundamental breach
of
personal security. Action needs to be taken as soon as possible to
make
sure this does not happen again.’ A spokeswoman for NHS Professionals
would not confirm whether access to the confidential files had been
granted.
SHOW THIS TO FEMA when they come to your door with an armed cop
or soldier and a needle. Tell them that they are being used to dispense
genocide.
SMART PAL WARNED ME:
Anita, "MEPHA, aka 'Law from Hell' is authorization for forced immunization.
Failure to comply provides for forced isolation for 'observation,'
and
since there will be more than hospitals can deal with, that means
detention camps, closed military bases (you wondered why so many were
being closed?), and closed prisons.
Further, because 'they have no way of knowing if contaminated,' all
personal property will be confiscated and become property of the
State, presumed short term (like they ever give property back seized
in drug matters, even if found innocent. Sure, after about five years
with fierce legal action to force it.)
As troubling, is the design of portable mass inoculation centers:
their design is spelled out in documents obtained from the CDC. The
following can be deduced (but may not be the only possible
explanation) from that design, which may or may not have been altered
since.
It provides for an initial identity screening with questionnaire
giving the impression of asking questions regarding health and
symptoms. Based on this, each individual might presume, they are
routed to two seemingly identical lines to a waiting area beyond which
they cannot see, where they are given a consent document (one side
only) or a disclaimer document (the other) and asked to sign. Each
side again might presume their side is identical to the other with
respect to this step. Races will be equally distributed so that there
is no discernment of any targeting of races. One by one they are seen
from both sides, presumably for treatment or whatever, with a fairly
quick frequency commensurate with typical speed of inoculation.
On one side (the right in the plans seen), there are three exits, from
the inoculation area, one an exit to the side, and one an exit to the
rear. The third leads to the other side beyond the 'treatment' area.
On the other side, there is only one exit to the rear, so all entering
from either of the left side or the right side door to the left side
exit there. The CDC plans call for soldiers/Police to be guarding all
entrance/exit points, as well as at inner locations.
We might therefore deduce that those refusing to consent are sent out
the rear on the side with three doors, or to the side if consenting
after inoculation. Those not giving consent go out the rear. Those
sent to that side who are targeted races will be sent out the inner
door to the other side.
On the other side, everyone goes to the rear - as political activists,
known criminals, and so forth, and those from select races (races
equally distributed perhaps left and right so as not to make anyone
assume selectivity on that basis).
Those going out a rear entrances might be forced by soldiers onto one
of two bus/trucks waiting, perhaps told they need to be sent to
another facility for possible side effect testing and treatment in
order to avoid a ruckus. Side entrances will not be able to see this
taking place. Everyone leaves non the wiser.
Those 'not consenting' according to 'official' records, will have
their property seized, allowing for a detailed search for any
materials considered dangerous to the State, illegal substances,
valuables (remember the Nazi vs. Jewish experience), etc. These will
likely go to detention areas. After a time, the 'findings' will be
that those not consenting died, and the property can be used or sold/
rented as suits government.
They may then be released to society as displaced persons with some
sort of aid in obtaining employment (perhaps working for the State)
and to rent housing (owned by the State). This would be a bit like
the
Coal miners of the 20s-40s who bought everything including rental of
their homes from the company/company store, and found themselves
deeper in debt, therefore unable to quit their jobs under threat of
'collection' by company goons.
Those leaving the left side might look forward to something scarier
than detention." Hmmmmm. What could that be?
I know. They
carry me out to a FEMA FARM IN IDAHO where
I am forced
to pollinize apple trees on a ladder all day,
taking over for the
BEES from COLONY COLLAPSE. In China they already
do this
with pear tree areas, as all bees died. Humans
on ladders with
brushes!
<===
BACK TO THE CONSPIRACY THEORY WEBSITE "JERRY's REFRIGERATOR"
and THE TIN FOIL HAT LIST OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES.