THE USA created AIDS in AFRICA to DEPOPULATE the CONTINENT

Debunking The "Out Of Africa" Origin Of HIV & AIDS
The Greatest Conspiracy Story Ever Told
by Alan Cantwell, M.D.
FOUND at RENSE.COM

AIDS is now more than a quarter-century old. The disease has killed
20 million people worldwide, and it is estimated that 40 million more
are infected with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), the virus that
causes AIDS.

Ask your physician where AIDS came from and he or she will probably
tell you the epidemic started when monkeys or chimps in the African
bush transferred the AIDS virus (HIV) to a person while butchering
primate meat for food or through an animal bite. For the first two
decades of the epidemic the green monkey theory of AIDS was widely
heralded in the major media, and was accepted without question by
leading AIDS experts and educators. The theory was so universally
popular (except in Africa) that it easily became fact in the minds of
most people.

Robert Gallo, M.D., and the Green Monkey Theory

The AIDS virus was first discovered by Robert Gallo at the National
Cancer Institute in April 1984. Shortly thereafter Luc Montagnier of
the Pasteur Institute in Paris claimed that he (and not Gallo) had
first discovered the AIDS virus. A bitter lawsuit followed, which was
finally settled privately in 1987 through the intervention of the
French Premier and President Ronald Reagan. To this day, the two
'co-discoverers' of HIV continue to disagree about the origin of HIV
and the birthplace of AIDS.

In Montagnier's book, Virus (2000), he states: "The origin of the
epidemic remains a mystery, and the virus seems older than the
epidemic" and "it is important to distinguish between the origins of
the virus and that of the (AIDS) epidemic."

The scientific scandal provoked by Gallo's "stealing" the virus from
the French, as well as the ensuing government investigations into
allegations of scientific irregularities and falsification of data in
Gallo's lab, undoubtedly is the reason both scientists have never
received a Nobel Prize for their discovery of HIV. A highly
unsympathetic account of this scientific mess is provided by Pulitzer
prize-winning author John Crewdson in, Science Fictions; A Scientific
Mystery, A Massive Cover-Up, and the Dark Legacy of Robert Gallo
(2002).

Because Gallo is the most powerful and influential AIDS scientist,
his views on the origin of HIV/AIDS have become gospel. He first
called his AIDS virus the "human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus"
because he believed it was closely related to newly discovered
cancer-causing retroviruses. The virus was quickly renamed human
T-cell lymphotropic virus-3 (HTLV-3), perhaps to obscure the
connection of the AIDS virus to laboratory cancer viruses, and to
downplay any association between cancer (which is thought to be
non-contagious) and AIDS (which is definitely a sexually-transmitted
disease).

THE ARTICLE AT JEFF RENSE's WEBSITE has this article &
Cancer Bacteria is shown, in blow up of Kaposi's sarcoma. Arrows
point to cancer microbes magnified 1000 times in
a skin tumor of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma in
a 52 year-old, black, bisexual man. The tissue
section is stained with Giemsa stain. In the
insert are bacteria cultured from the KS tumor
and identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis
(same magnification). Note how the size and
shape of the variably-sized round (coccus) forms
of the bacteria are identical in size and shape
to the bacteria seen in the KS cancer tumor.
These bacteria in Kaposi's are similar to
bacteria reported in enlarged lymph nodes in
AIDS, as well as in other AIDS-damaged tissue.
Similar bacteria have also been observed and
reported in other forms of cancer, such as
lymphoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and
others. The finding of similar bacteria in both
cancer and AIDS suggest a close relationship
between these two diseases. Robert Gallo, M.D.
says AIDS is an epidemic of cancer. In the 1970s
the knowledge achieved by the study of cancer
retroviruses helped lead to the discovery of the
AIDS virus in 1984. Unfortunately, the presence
of "cancer microbes" in cancer and AIDS has been
totally ignored by the medical establishment.

Where did Gallo's new virus come from? In the prestigious journal
Science (Jan 4, 1985) it was reported that Gallo's AIDS virus was
most closely related to "slow viruses" (lentiviruses) found in sheep
and goats, particularly the visna virus in sheep, which causes
pneumonia, neurologic changes, and wasting. However, Gallo declared
that his virus was not visna virus, but might be "another animal
viruses coming into man...and this means we have to look more closely
at these animals as models and these types of animal viruses. No one
knows if the viruses could have stemmed from a common viral ancestor
hundreds or thousands of years ago, or if a virus moved between
species only decades ago from human exposure to the virus of sheep or
goats."

The idea that HIV was "closely related" to the sheep visna virus did
not last long. The idea of a sheep virus infecting gay men would have
undoubtedly aroused suspicion because the only place one could find
visna was in research labs where visna virus had been seeded and
"adapted" into various animal species, as well as into human cells,
for the two decades prior to the "gay plague."

Gallo, with the help of veterinarian Max Essex of Harvard, convinced
the AIDS experts and the adoring media that AIDS came from green
monkeys. In Gallo's book Virus Hunting [1991], he claims that in 1983
(a year before his discovery) Ann Giudici Fettner, a free-lance
journalist who had lived in Africa, told him that the virus came from
green monkeys in central Africa. In 1983 the African connection to
AIDS was tenuous, and in Fettner's 1984 book, The Truth About AIDS,
she never mentioned green monkeys and the African origin of AIDS. In
fact, on page 44, she emphatically states: "AIDS started as an
American disease."

There are no scientific papers which uphold the green monkey theory.
The monkey out of Africa theory lasted until the late 1990s when
another group of American scientists claimed the virus definitely
originated in a specific species of chimpanzee found in Africa.

The green monkey theory was scientifically doomed from the very
start, although that apparently did not phase the scientists who
undoubtedly wanted to place the blame on the dark continent -- and
take the origin of HIV out of Manhattan, where the first cases were
discovered in 1979, and push the origin to the other side of the
world.

The Marriage of Cancer Research and Biowarfare in 1971

Whatever the theoretical origin of HIV/AIDS, there is no doubt that
the epidemic started a decade after scientists began "adapting"
massive numbers of cancer-causing and immunosuppressive animal
viruses and transferring them between various animal species in an
attempt to experimentally produce cancer in the laboratory. In the
process of these "species-jumping" experiments, the scientists mixed
viruses together, seeded them into the bodies of various animal
species, and planted them into animal and human cell cultures. In the
process myriads of new, laboratory-created mutant, hybrid and
recombinant viruses were created, some of which were exceedingly
dangerous.

These engineered and deadly viruses were obviously of interest to
biowarfare scientists. Donald A MacArthur stated in Congressional
testimony in 1969 that "molecular biology is a field that is
advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a
period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic
biological agent, an agent that does not exist naturally exist and
for which no natural immunity could have been acquired."

The dangers provoked by all these laboratory-created new virus were
well known. At a symposium on leukemia research in 1973, Danish
pathologist J Clemmesen warned that the transmissibility of these
genetically -altered viral agents could cause a world epidemic of
cancer if they escaped from the laboratory. (Gallo has publicly
stated AIDS is an epidemic of cancer.) That same year cancer
virologists convened at a conference entitled "Biohazards in
Biological Research" at Asilomar, California. Despite the risks, it
was decided to continue perilous animal cancer virus experimentation.

People are often surprised to find there is a close relationship
between traditional cancer virus research and biological warfare
programs and experimentation. However, it is a fact that in 1971
President Richard Nixon, as part of his War On Cancer, combined the
U.S. Army's biowarfare department at Ft. Detrick, Maryland, with the
National Cancer Institute. The army's DNA and genetic engineering
programs were coordinated into anti-cancer research and molecular
biology programs. This marriage also cemented the governmental ties
of cancer research to the CIA, the CDC, the World Health
Organization, and private industry.

During this same period the Special Virus Cancer Program (1968-1980),
now largely and conveniently forgotten, was established to coordinate
the search for cancer-causing viruses. The U.S. biological warfare
program is highly secret. This secrecy also surrounds the many
scientists who directly or indirectly contribute to the program.
Naturally, there is no complete record of what this Virus Cancer
Program has achieved or what cancer-causing and immunosuppressive
animal cancer viruses were adapted for biological warfare use and for
covert military testing on human populations.(For more details and
129,000 citations, go to www.google.com and type-in key words :
biological warfare human experimentation.)

A computer PUBMED search employing the key words "U.S. Army
Biological Warfare Program" yields only 44 citations. One entry
(PMID: 11572136) reads: "The United States began its BW program based
on intelligence information and a very thorough evaluation of that
information by a panel of scientists, engineers, medical personnel
from a variety of areas including the military, other government
agencies, industry, and the academic community. Initial efforts were
directed toward defense against BW, but it soon became clear defense
required a knowledge of offensive capabilities. The initial offensive
studies started with a definition of what infectious organisms were
available, how they could grow in quantities to support a munitions
program, what kind of facilities were required, and where they could
be positioned. Further studies were then initiated to design and
evaluate testing sites and methodologies to evaluate the weapons.
During all of these phases, concurrent medical and safety programs
were studied, emphasized, and implemented. These studies resulted in
the development of a number of vaccines, toxoids, treatments,
therapies, and facility personnel management. The overall conclusion
was that BW, offensive and defensive, was possible, and efficiencies
could be obtained. The work accomplished by this group of very
dedicated military and civilian personnel at military installations,
universities, research institutes, and industrial organizations
presented truly a combined operation with numerous achievements. Many
of the detailed achievements were published in the open scientific,
peer-reviewed journals, and many patents were obtained. The current
defensive program is breaking new scientific ground and there is
evidence indicating that very rapid detection and identification of
BW agents is possible and will be instrumented."
 
 

Is it "conspiracy theory" to question whether a virus "closely
related" to HIV was created in any of the many laboratories
contributing to the Special Virus Cancer Program and its connection
to biowarfare research during the 1970s? Could covert human testing
of classified biowarfare agents explain the exclusive "introduction"
of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in America, via the
government-sponsored experimental hepatitis B experiments that began
in Manhattan in New York City in 1978 -- the year before the onset of
the "gay plague."

The American Origin of AIDS in 1979

In 1979 the first young white gay men to come down with "gay-related
immunodeficiency disease" was reported to the CDC. For the first year
of the epidemic all the men were from Manhattan. They were all
defined as young, predominantly white, previously healthy,
well-educated and promiscuous.

The Manhattan men were similar in profile to the 1,083 gay men who
signed up for the hepatitis B experiment conducted at the New York
Blood Center, also located in Manhattan. The experimental vaccine was
developed in chimpanzees. The injections began in November 1978, and
were concluded a year later. Similar vaccine experiments in gay men
were undertaken in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis and
Chicago, beginning in March 1980 and continued until October 1981, a
few months after the epidemic had become "official." (For more
details, google: the hepatitis B vaccine experiment.)

AIDS became official in the U.S. in June 1981. At the time AIDS was
unknown in Africa, and the epidemic did not begin there until autumn
1982 at the earliest. After Gallo discovered HIV in April 1984, an
HIV blood test was developed and was used on the stored gay blood
specimens deposited at the Center as part of the ongoing experiment
and follow-up. In 1980, a year before the epidemic became official,
already 20% of the men's blood in the experiment were HIV-positive.
By 1983, 30% of the men were positive; by 1984, 40%.

AIDS scientists repeatedly claim HIV was lurking in Africa for
decades, centuries, even millennia, before the epidemic. But there
was no "incubation period" in America.

As soon as large numbers of gay people came out of the closet and
signed up for government experiments, the gay community was doomed.
Not only was one virus (HIV) "introduced" into the homosexual
population, but two additional "mycoplasma" bacteria-like agents and
a new herpes virus as well. In addition, I wrote in books and medical
journals that "cancer-causing bacteria" were also operative in AIDS,
but all my research linking AIDS to cancer remains ignored by the
AIDS establishment. (For full details and 458 citations: google:
"alan cantwell" +bacteria +AIDS.)

"Gay Cancer": A mystery wrapped in an enigma

Three years before HIV was discovered, my research uncovering
bacteria in Kaposi's sarcoma was published. KS became widely known as
the "gay cancer" associated with AIDS. In the late 1970s, as a
dermatologist, I studied the cancerous tissue of three elderly,
presumably straight married men with KS, a very rare skin cancer that
few physicians had ever seen. I identified bacteria in the cancerous
tissue; and bacteria were cultured from skin biopsies. When the first
gay men with KS appeared in my office, I studied their skin tumors
for bacteria. A PUBMED computer search lists 7 of my research papers
published in medical journals between the years 1981-1986 showing
bacteria in the KS lesions of straight and gay men with KS and AIDS,
in the enlarged lymph nodes of "AIDS-related complex", and in two
autopsy studies showing bacteria in the internal organs of a straight
man who died of KS before the epidemic, and a gay man who died of KS
and AIDS.

[Image] My bacterial research showed a close relationship of AIDS to
cancer. This research is included in my books, AIDS:The
Mystery & the Solution (1984), and The Cancer Microbe (1990). When
Gallo was asked about my KS research in a published interview by
James D'Eramo in 1984, he ignored the question. When asked why only
homosexuals were the first victims of AIDS, he replied: "Because they
were exposed." To this day Gallo and Montagnier refuse to acknowledge
any aspect of this research.

In 1993, Shyh-Ching Lo of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
reported the finding of 2 different infectious agents in the blood,
urine and KS tumors of AIDS patients. At first, he thought the
microbes were viruses, but later determined they were actually very
small forms of bacteria called "mycoplasmas." After Lo's discovery,
the Army quickly took out patents on his infectious agents, which he
calls Mycoplasma fermentens and M. penetrans. My KS research was
never mentioned in any of his papers.

In 1994, a new infectious and sexually-transmitted herpes virus
called "human herpes virus-8" was proclaimed to be the agent causing
all pre-AIDS and AIDS-related KS. This virus is now widely accepted
as the sole cause. I thought it rather strange that there was never
any evidence that KS was transmissible before AIDS, and that a "new"
virus could cause a rare cancerous disease that has been around since
the 1870s.

Montagnier thinks mycoplasmas might be a necessary "co-factor" which
accelerates the progression of HIV infection in AIDS patients. He
also believes antibiotic therapy along with antiviral therapy is
better treatment for AIDS. Where did these new mycoplasmas come from?
Where did HIV come from? Offering homophobic explanations and no
evidence in his Virus book, the French virologist theorizes that
American gay tourists brought back these agents from Africa to the
U.S.

Evidence of blood infection with the new KS human herpes virus-8 is
now present in as many as 40% of men with prostate cancer. In Texas,
15% of normal blood donors now test positive for the virus. This
means the virus is in the American blood supply; and blood is not
screened for the virus. Where did the "new" herpes virus come from? A
"close relative" is the Herpes saimiri virus of squirrel monkeys, a
virus that was extensively passed around in the Special Virus Cancer
Program.

Chimpanzees and the Polio Vaccine Theory of AIDS

 In 1999 the publication of The River: A Journey to the Source
of HIV and AIDS, by journalist Edward Hooper, received
widespread media attention. Hooper theorizes that HIV was introduced
into Africans via chimp virus-contaminated polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. His massive book does not adequately explain why it
took 30 years for the epidemic to appear in Africa, nor how a
sexually-transmitted disease in black Africans in the early 1980s
could have transformed itself into a white gay man's disease in New
York City in the late 1970s. Furthermore, there are no HIV-positive
tissue or blood specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s, and
no proven cases of AIDS either, to indicate HIV was "incubating" in
the African population. Hooper quickly dismisses the claims of Robert
Strecker, the first physician whistle-blower of man-made AIDS, as
well as the man-made research in my own two books on the man-made
origin: AIDS & The Doctors of Death, and Queer Blood.

By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, Hooper
greatly simplified his theory of AIDS origin. He ignores all the
primate/simian viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s
and 70s, and all those genetically altered viruses for cancer
research, vaccine research, and secret biological warfare.

The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick
On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, M.D, longtime AIDS-writer for
The New York Times, dutifully reported "the riddle of the origin of
the AIDS virus has apparently been solved." A team of researchers,
headed by Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral
studies on three chimps in the African wild and studied the frozen
remains of a chimp, discovered by accident in a freezer at the Army's
biowarfare center at Fort Detrick. The chimp had tested positive for
HIV in 1985. On the basis of this research, Hahn declared that a
common subspecies of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the
animal source of the virus "most closely" related to HIV. In a media
blitz U.S. government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral
"family tree" of primate viruses (which few people could understand)
to prove that HIV was genetically descended from a chimp virus in the
African bush.
Hahn theorizes the epidemic could have started when a hunter became
infected by cutting himself while butchering chimp meat. Back in the
1980s Hahn worked in Gallo's lab, and like Gallo she ignores the
entire history of animal cancer virus laboratory transfers in the
decades preceding AIDS, as well as the fact that chimp kidneys were
transplanted into humans back in the 1960s in New York City. Another
big problem is that after scientists pump viruses into captive lab
chimps in laboratories in the U.S. and Africa, they sometimes release
them back into the wild. Obviously, the mix of lab animal viruses
with viruses in the wild make the determination of viral "ancestry"
somewhat iffy.

AIDS scientists totally accepted Hahn's notion that HIV jumped
species from chimps to humans back in the 1930s to start the
epidemic. The media again explained this was the first time that
primate viruses had jumped species "naturally," again failing to
mention all the millions of people around the world who had the
primate/simian SV40 virus injected into them along with their polio
shot.

How accurate and meaningful is the ancestry of all these animal
retroviruses? Do words used by scientists to compare different
viruses, such as "closely related" and "distally related" (meaning
related far from the point of origin) really tell us how a suspected
primate virus like HIV got into the human population? For example, it
is widely reported in scientific circles that no two HIV viruses are
exactly alike. This is because HIV mutates readily and takes on some
of the molecular components of the cells it invades. When it comes to
viral "relationships" the only absolutely identical HIV viruses in
scientific history was the virus presented by Gallo as his discovery,
and the virus presented by Montagnier as his discovery. The genetic
evidence indicated it was impossible for these two scientists to have
discovered identical viruses on two different continents, even though
Gallo insisted his virus was not the same as Montagnier's. Thus, the
lawsuit.
The moral of this story is: If the two most highly respected AIDS
scientists cannot agree on the ancestry of identical twin viruses,
then how can we be sure when they tell us which virus is related to
which virus -- particularly when many engineered laboratory viruses
are not even recorded and entered into so-called virus banks or
registries which are used to compare the genetic make-up of "known"
viruses. Let's face it, if your old ancestors are not recorded in a
book somewhere, you will never find them as ancestors.

The Origin of AIDS Conference, London, 2000

In October 2000 the Royal Society of London held a two-day conference
on the origins of HIV. Needless to say, the man-made theory was not
discussed. One professor emphatically declared: "All human infectious
diseases have an animal origin." Hooper's polio theory was totally
discredited; and Hahn's new chimp theory, dating HIV back to the
1930s, was acclaimed.

The "Last Word" at the conference was that "all human viral
infections were initially zoonotic (animal) in origin. Animals will
always provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human
populations in the future." The scientists predicted: "There is still
a myriad of current unknown viruses in animal populations on land,
sea, and air with the potential to cause human disease." But what
about the millions of dangerous virus created in animal laboratories?
That was never considered.

A person cannot contract AIDS from a monkey or chimp

In the July 2000 issue of Lancet, virologist and primatologist
Preston Marx states: "There is no evidence that a person can contract
AIDS from a monkey or chimpanzee". According to Marx, research shows
humans were infected with SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) in
Africa and that these SIV infections were the root origin of HIV.
Therefore SIV is the monkey ancestor virus of HIV. And Marx has no
doubt that HIV originated from SIV in African non-human primates.

AIDS educators often claim that AIDS is a "zoonosis", meaning a
disease of animals that can be transmitted to humans, but Marx says
this assumption is incorrect. AIDS as a zoonosis would mean that
humans had contracted not only an SIV infection from a monkey or a
chimp, but that they also eventually became sick with AIDS from the
monkey virus infection. We have not established that AIDS is a
zoonosis (meaning a disease people catch from monkeys). He further
declares "We do not know what launches animal viruses to become
epidemic in humans. There may be a social, viral-genetic or
immunologic basis for new epidemics. We do not have this answer for
the AIDS epidemic, but we do know that HIV originated from simian
species."

In a more recent October 2004 article "AIDS as a zoonosis? Confusion
over the origin of the virus and the origin of the epidemic", Marx
and his colleagues further speculate that HIV (derived from a
primate) in the 1950s in Africa could have been made more dangerous
and transmissible by dirty needles used in vaccine programs, as well
as contaminated blood transfusions. The repeated passage from
human-to-human (so called "serial passage") via SIV
virus-contaminated needles could have transformed a harmless SIV in
humans to the deadly and genetically-changed HIV virus causing AIDS.

Human exposure to SIV is thousands of years old, but AIDS merged only
in the 20th century. Marx never suggests that contaminated vaccines,
rather than needles, could have initiated the African epidemic.
However, if AIDS does not qualify as a zoonosis, I interpret this to
mean that Hahn's "cut hunter theory" could not account for the
explosion of HIV/AIDS in Africa in the 1980s. Finally, Marx's team
suggests that more "research is needed to understand the processes by
which animal viruses cause sustained human-to-human transmission,
epidemics and even pandemics. Much is known about emerging viruses,
but almost nothing is known about emerging viral diseases."

WHO Murdered Africa?

Apparently forgotten, ignored, or unknown by Marx was a similar
vaccine and needle scenario reported on May 11, 1987, on the
front-page of The London Times, entitled "Smallpox vaccine triggered
AIDS virus." Science editor Pierce Wright suggested that African AIDS
was a direct result of the World Health Organization's smallpox
eradication program conducted in the 1970s. The smallpox vaccine
allegedly awakened a "dormant" AIDS virus infection in the black
population. Gallo was quoted as saying, "The link between the WHO
program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis.
I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for
some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for
smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV (the AIDS
virus)."

The Times report is one of the most important stories ever printed on
the AIDS epidemic; yet the story was killed and never appeared in any
major U.S. newspaper or magazine. However, the report is widely
circulated on the internet as evidence to suggest that AIDS appeared
in Africa via accidental or deliberate vaccine contamination with the
AIDS virus. (Google: WHO murdered Africa).

Kenyan ecologist and biologist Wangari Maathai was obviously aware of
this vaccine connection when she won the Nobel Peace Prize in October
2004, and shocked reporters by claiming the AIDS virus was a
deliberately created biological agent developed by evil-minded
scientists and released in Africa to cause mass extermination of
blacks.

In Magic Shots [1982], Allan Chase claims that during the years
1966-1977, the WHO utilized "200,000 people in forty countries --
most of them non-doctors trained by seven hundred doctors and health
professionals from over seventy participating countries -- spent $300
million, and used forty million bifurcated vaccinating needles to
administer 24,000 million (2.4 billion) doses of smallpox vaccine."
This is also proof of extensive needle re-use.

There is absolutely no evidence to show that large numbers of African
blacks were "incubating" HIV, or any other primate/simian virus
before the outbreak. This is why the out of Africa idea is theory and
not fact.

Despite this lack of evidence, the monkey/chimp and primate/simian
origin of HIV/AIDS is a well-accepted scientific theory. In contrast,
the man-made "introduction" of HIV in the late 1970s is condemned as
"conspiracy theory". Although taboo, the man-made theory refuses to
go away, and is alive and well on the internet. A google search,
using the key words "man made origin of AIDS," will elicit 1,220,000
citations to various web sites.

HIV: Out of Africa? Or out of a virus laboratory?

Precise answers to how AIDS originated depends on which "expert" you
ask. Montagnier points to the United States and gay men as the source
of the virus. Could the virus have been transmitted from chimpanzees
to humans? Montagnier says yes. But, he adds, humans could have
transmitted the virus to the chimpanzees! How could humans have
transmitted the virus to chimps? Unfortunately, the Frenchman did not
elaborate on this.

Could HIV be a primate/simian virus originating in a virus laboratory
? Such questions are never seriously proposed or answered by
virologists. However, well-known to insiders are the embarrassing
contamination problems with primate viruses which have plagued
Gallo's lab at the NCI and Essex's lab at Harvard.

A case in point is Gallo's reported 1975 "discovery" of a "new" and
"human" virus reported in scientific journals as "HL-23." This virus
was eventually proven to be not one, but three different ape viruses
(gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus and baboon endogenous virus).
Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his
research.

Essex, who along with Gallo heavily promoted the erroneous green
monkey theory, had similar woes. In 1986 he announced the discovery
of a "new" human AIDS virus (HTLV-4). This "human" virus bore a
striking similarity to a monkey retrovirus known as STLV-3. In
February 1988, the mystery was solved. Essex's new "human" HTLV-4
virus turned out to be a monkey virus that accidentally contaminated
Essex's human blood samples. The source of the monkey contamination
was traced back to blood samples from a monkey that was
experimentally infected by an AIDS-like virus at the New England
Regional Primate Research Center in Southborough, Massachusetts.
Carol Mulder of the University of Massachusetts Medical School
cautioned: "This episode should serve as a strong warning for all
virologists to check any newly discovered viruses against viruses
present in the laboratory."

In the decade before AIDS broke out in gay men, Essex created "cat
AIDS" in a series of experiments. In 1974, chimpanzee AIDS was also
created deliberately by feeding heavily virus-contaminated cows' milk
to newborn chimps. For the very first time, veterinarians were able
to produce leukemia in chimps, as well as a lung infection, later
known as the "gay pneumonia" of AIDS. As Montagnier should be aware,
human cancerous tissue and blood was routinely injected into primates
as part of the Special Virus Cancer Program. Mysterious AIDS-like
illnesses also occurred in primate laboratories a few years before
AIDS. And chimp viruses also jumped species back in the 1960s when
chimp kidneys were experimentally transplanted into humans.

We are informed that the AIDS epidemic is the result of a primate
virus jumping species for the first time. However, polio vaccines
given to millions of people in the 50s and 60s were heavily
contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus called SV-40 (simian
virus 40). Over the decades various studies indicate this virus is
implicated in several forms of human cancer, although government
scientists continue to deny any association. For a complete analysis
of this polio vaccine contamination, read (or google) The Virus and
the Vaccine [2004].

The man-made theory of AIDS proclaims that HIV was introduced into
American gays and African blacks via vaccine programs. Why is this
theory deemed paranoia by the media and the AIDS establishment? Why
is discussionnot allowed? Why have scientists suppressed the
extensive history of animal cancer virus transfer in the decade
before AIDS?

Is there a scientific conspiracy to get scientists off the hook by
blaming monkeys in the bush, and gays and Africans, for the millions
of death brought about by the "introduction" of HIV into the world
population? Of course there is. That's why it's The Greatest
Conspiracy Story Ever Told.

- Alan Cantwell has writing extensively on the origin of AIDS and
cancer for the past two decades. He is the author of AIDS: The
Mystery and the Solution; AIDS and the Doctors of Death; Queer Blood,
and The Cancer Microbe, all published by Aries Rising Press, Los
Angeles, CA, and available through internet sources.
Email:alancantwell@sbcglobal.net

There are engineered diseases. The FLU in UKRAINE which is killing a million may be PUTIN's gift to the rebel colony he hates.read : http://educate-yourself.org/ed/
See also:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/aids.htm

<=== BACK TO THE CONSPIRACY INDEX, "JERRY's REFRIGERATOR" and the Tin Foil Hat archive of CONSPIRACY THEORIES